
Perceptic
AI operating system for drug discovery and clinical development
Last verified August 17, 2026 · Updated daily
What Perceptic is building
Drug discovery today is a handoff problem. A research team surfaces a candidate. The insight dies at the interface with the next team. The clinical group starts over with partial information. Decisions worth billions get made on incomplete pictures because the systems involved were never designed to communicate. Perceptic is the connective tissue: a shared AI intelligence layer that follows the drug, not the department. The platform has three components. Scout handles asset scouting, rapidly triaging external licensing candidates and competitive programs against a company's strategic objectives, compressing weeks of due diligence into hours. PercepticOS is the internal intelligence layer: it connects a pharma company's proprietary tools and data, lets scientists test hypotheses, and builds a persistent institutional knowledge base that does not vanish when a project ends. Atlas is the clinical data foundation, consolidating internal and external trial data for deeper analysis, and has achieved a 50-fold increase in clinical data extraction speed at production deployments. Every output traces back to its source. No hallucinations. Every claim auditable. The architecture is model-agnostic: customers bring their own data, hardware, and AI tools. Perceptic provides the operating system underneath.
Why this matters
The AI in drug discovery market stood at $1.72 billion in 2024 and is projected to surpass $8.5 billion by 2030. But the market has been building instruments, not infrastructure. Isomorphic Labs, Recursion, Insilico Medicine: all of them operate inside a single stage of the pipeline. Molecule design. Protein structure. Patient recruitment. Each is a better instrument for a specific step. None of them fixes the handoff. That is the problem Perceptic is solving, and it is the one that every pharma executive feels viscerally. A drug approved today took over a decade to develop and cost upwards of $2 billion. A significant portion of that cost is friction, not science. Insights disappearing between teams. Institutional knowledge evaporating between projects. Promising paths unexplored because the researchers did not know someone else had already ruled out a variant. As Flock told Fortune: "Too many critical drug development decisions still happen without a complete view of the evidence." No AI-discovered drug has yet completed human clinical trials and been approved. The scepticism is real and warranted. Perceptic's bet is that the bottleneck is not molecular intelligence. It is the operating system that connects molecular intelligence to the decision-making chain. If they are right, they are building the category's foundation rather than competing inside it.
Open roles at Perceptic
7 positions we're tracking. Roles are re-checked daily and removed when filled.
Software Engineer (Full Stack)
First seen 2 months ago
Lead DevOps Engineer
First seen 2 months ago
Product Manager
First seen 2 months ago
Platform Engineer
First seen 2 months ago
Product Designer
First seen 2 months ago
Account Strategist
First seen 2 months ago
Forward Deployed Scientist
First seen 2 months ago
Know when Perceptic is hiring before anyone else
A role stays uncontested for about four days. Here's the window — and where we put you in it.
From $9/month, cancel any time.
Watching Perceptic
0 applicantsRole spotted & verified
1You get the alert
1You've applied
~8Hits the job boards
250+Hiring outlook
Very High. Seven roles live on the careers page, posted the same day as the stealth exit. The Londoner Post reported the capital is earmarked "primarily for engineering expansion and growing Perceptic's customer base." That is two separate mandates activated simultaneously.
Working at Perceptic
Perceptic: AI operating system for drug discovery and clinical development. Founded , currently <50 employees. What this means for you: broad remit, direct access to founders, and equity that still means something if the company works out.
Most Perceptic jobs are based in London.
How to actually get hired at Perceptic
Why applying the normal way doesn't work
With only <50 employees, Perceptic doesn't have dedicated recruiters. Founders review applications between running the company. The challenge isn't competition — it's visibility. Direct outreach wins.
Who to contact at Perceptic
Founding team
Tilman Flock is one of a small number of people who have published landmark research in structural biology and then gone on to build production enterprise AI at scale. He is a computational and molecular biologist who completed his research fellowship at Fitzwilliam College, University of Cambridge, supervised by Madan Babu at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. His doctoral and postdoctoral work focused on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the single largest class of drug targets in medicine: roughly a third of all approved drugs work by binding to GPCRs. His papers, published in Nature and co-authored with Frances Arnold (2018 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry) and other leaders in structural biology, have been cited over 2,800 times. The most-cited work described a universal allosteric mechanism for how GPCRs activate G proteins, a foundational result for anyone designing drugs that target this receptor class. Flock's intellectual arc is the direct predecessor to Perceptic. He spent years at Cambridge asking: how do GPCRs selectively engage the right signaling partners at the molecular level? At Palantir, the same question took a different form: how do fragmented enterprise data systems selectively connect insights to the right decision-makers? The computational biology trained him to think about selectivity, specificity, and the cost of missed connections in complex systems. Palantir gave him the production AI infrastructure to solve those problems at enterprise scale. He spent nearly seven years at Palantir, building AIP and running the Life Sciences practice. He was the person who sat in rooms with pharma executives and translated what LLMs could actually do in production inside regulated data environments. His Fortune interview is the most complete public record of his product thesis: "Too many critical drug development decisions still happen without a complete view of the evidence." That is not a market observation. It is the frustration of someone who has watched it happen up close for seven years. His Google Scholar profile lists 24 published papers with sustained citation growth through 2025 and 2026, despite having been in industry since 2019. That means his academic work is still generating downstream research from the scientific community, even though he has moved on. He is listed as a former Palantir employee with a verified institutional email from his Cambridge fellowship days, a small detail that reflects a researcher who kept both identities active even as he shifted domains. He is based in Switzerland, which gives Perceptic's Basel presence its anchor. What he talks about publicly: Flock is not a frequent social media poster. His public intellectual output is concentrated in the papers and in the handful of founder interviews he has given since stealth exit. His Fortune interview reveals a specific frustration: the AI drug discovery community has been building better instruments at individual stages of the pipeline, while the decision-making architecture connecting those stages remains broken. He does not name competitors carelessly. He named the problem. Lesser-known facts: His published research includes a collaboration with Frances Arnold's lab at Caltech on cofactor specificity switching in oxidoreductases, an enzyme engineering problem with direct implications for industrial biotechnology. Arnold won the 2018 Nobel for directed evolution. Flock's work with her lab is a quiet signal about the range of his scientific collaborations and the level at which he was operating as a computational biologist. His Fitzwilliam College fellowship was at one of Cambridge's oldest colleges, the same institution that produced the architects of the Human Genome Project. He left Cambridge research for Palantir not because the science was done, but because he could see that the production AI infrastructure problem was going to determine whether the science could ever be used properly inside pharma.
Martin Copes started coding at age 12 in Uruguay, sneaking out of bed at night to build an online tennis game on a heavy CRT monitor. He released it to tens of thousands of players worldwide before he was a teenager. That is the founding data point: he is a builder for whom the feedback loop of releasing something into the world is a genuine physiological need, not a career strategy. He describes the feeling of watching players react to his game as "the feeling I've been chasing since." The second time he felt it was getting his hands on GPT-2. He is a biomedical researcher who made a sharp pivot into production AI. His academic background is in biomedical research, specifically studying how AI can be applied to understand complex biological systems. He was, in his own words, grinding all-nighters over biological data before he discovered large language models. When he encountered GPT-2, he treated it the way he had treated his childhood game engine: as something to be understood from the inside, immediately. That obsession took him to Palantir in 2022. At Palantir, he and Zaki Trache were pulled in personally by Shyam Sankar, Palantir's CTO, to build the technical foundations of AIP from its earliest days. They scaled the core LLM services underlying AIP to process millions of reasoning requests per second with fine-grained access controls, work that Copes describes as "long before 'agents' became fashionable." The AIP architecture that every Palantir life sciences customer uses today was built by this founding team. That is not a resume line. It is product proof. His LinkedIn announcement post for Perceptic is the most revealing public document about how he thinks. He describes the biological motivation in precise terms: "Drug discovery isn't just expensive and slow because the science is hard. Even the best researchers can only go so deep in so many directions at once. Critical context gets lost between teams. Institutional knowledge disappears between projects. Promising paths go unexplored. Not for lack of ideas, but for lack of capacity." That is a product thesis written by someone who understands both the science and the software failure modes simultaneously. What he talks about publicly: Copes posts rarely and specifically. His Perceptic announcement post is long, personal, and technically precise. He is not interested in thought leadership. He is interested in showing his work. The combination of biomedical research background and AIP-level production engineering is rare, and he knows it, but he does not advertise it generically. He describes specific decisions, specific scale numbers, specific feelings about what building means. Lesser-known facts: Copes grew up in Uruguay, which puts him in the company of a small but serious cohort of South American technical founders who came up through entirely non-standard pathways into global enterprise AI. He self-taught programming from a CRT monitor in a country where the tech ecosystem was negligible. The game he released to tens of thousands of players worldwide was not a school project. It was an independent product, built by a child, distributed globally. That is the throughline of the founding team: all three of them built things in difficult environments before anyone gave them permission or resources to do it.
Zaki Trache is the third co-founder and, alongside Martin Copes, the person who built the technical foundations of Palantir's AIP. He and Copes were both recruited personally by Shyam Sankar to establish the LLM infrastructure layer that became AIP's core. Copes' LinkedIn post names him specifically: "Zaki and I were pulled in by Shyam Sankar to wire the foundation for Palantir's AIP." That verb, "wire," is precise. They were not the product managers or the strategy team. They were the people who built the circuits that everything else ran on. Perceptic is based in London and Basel. The Basel presence is where Tilman's scientific network and Swiss pharma ecosystem connections live. Zaki and Martin are the London engineering anchor. Together, all three founders bring a combination that is genuinely uncommon: one founder with published Nature-level structural biology research and six years of Palantir life sciences deployment experience, and two founders who built the LLM infrastructure layer that Palantir now sells to the world. Perceptic did not need to go find domain expertise or production AI experience. It was founded by all three simultaneously. Zaki maintains a low public profile outside LinkedIn. He is not a frequent poster or public intellectual in the way Flock has become in the life sciences AI community. His work is in the architecture. The best public evidence of his thinking is the product itself, which has achieved a 50-fold increase in clinical data extractions in production and is scaling asset scouting from hundreds per week to thousands in minutes. What he talks about publicly: Minimal public presence. LinkedIn is the primary surface. His contributions to Perceptic's technical direction are documented through the product outcomes and through Copes' and Flock's public descriptions of the AIP-building work. Lesser-known facts: Being personally recruited by Shyam Sankar is not a standard hiring event at Palantir. Sankar is Palantir's CTO and the person most directly responsible for AIP's technical vision. He does not pull in engineers personally for generic hires. The fact that both Zaki and Martin were recruited this way, before AIP was what it is now, and that they stayed to build the core LLM infrastructure layer from scratch, means they have worked on the hardest part of what is now Palantir's most commercially important product. That is the engineering pedigree Perceptic is building on.
What to show them
Perceptic's three products (Scout, PercepticOS, Atlas) are live in production at top-10 pharma companies. That means the engineering team is building and maintaining real workflows inside some of the most security-conscious and data-sensitive organisations on the planet. Full-stack here means owning the interface between scientist-facing product surfaces and the AI systems underneath. The bar is set by the Palantir AIP pedigree: production-grade from day one. Core skills: TypeScript or Python, React or similar frontend framework, enterprise API integration patterns, security-aware development (audit trails, access controls), LLM integration, data pipeline design, experience shipping software that non-technical users depend on daily. Proof of work: Build a minimal two-panel interface where a researcher can paste a clinical trial abstract and receive a structured extraction of the key endpoints, study design, and patient population, with each extracted claim linked back to its source sentence. The traceability requirement, every claim to its source, is Perceptic's central design principle. Publish the code and document your source-linking approach.
A cold email that works at Perceptic
What Perceptic screens for
The press release from the Londoner Post is explicit: the $12M is earmarked "primarily for engineering expansion and growing Perceptic's customer base." Seven roles live on announcement day across five engineering and product titles and two commercial ones. That is a well-organised hiring sprint, not an exploratory posting. Accel's involvement is the most important investor signal. Sonali De Rycker tracked the Perceptic founding team while they were still at Palantir, met them shortly after they left, and invested roughly a year later when paid production was already running. That timeline means Accel has been studying this team since 2024 and watched them prove product-market fit before writing the check. De Rycker also led Accel's $100M healthcare AI bet on Tandem, which means she is not making a generic AI investment here. She is making a specific bet on lifecycle-spanning pharma AI infrastructure, and she has backed it twice in the same category. Portfolio companies at Accel in this position are typically pushed to build commercial scale fast: more customers, more enterprise relationships, faster deployment cycles. That means the Forward Deployed Scientist and Account Strategist roles are as urgent as the engineering ones. Air Street Capital's Nathan Benaich is the second key signal. Benaich runs the State of AI Report, the most widely read annual analysis of AI research and application trends in the world. His GP quote is precise: "Pharma's next R&D leap will come from the operating system connecting data, decisions, and context across the entire drug development process. The category is forming around Perceptic." Benaich does not use language like "the category is forming around X" casually. He backed DeepMind's spinouts, Wayve, and Coreweave at early stages. His conviction here is a research-grade signal about where enterprise pharma AI is heading. Elder Gull is a smaller but targeted addition: a life sciences-focused fund whose participation signals that people inside the pharma investment ecosystem, not just general AI investors, have validated the thesis. The careers page has seven live roles. All applications via careers@perceptic.ai. No ATS. Direct email only.
Don't send a generic CV to Perceptic. Mirror the job posting's language to get past automated screening.
Don't make these mistakes
Leading with enthusiasm about AI drug discovery in general, or mentioning Isomorphic, Recursion, or Insilico Medicine without making clear you understand why Perceptic is not competing with them. Flock has explicitly positioned the company as orthogonal to those players. If your outreach implies you see them as comparable, you have not read his thesis.
Mistakes that kill Perceptic applications
At <50 people, a copy-paste CV is immediately obvious. It's an instant no.
Nobody cares what you want. Start with The AI in drug discovery market stood at $1 and how you'd help.
Don't apply and wait. The median AI application gets no response ever. One follow-up at day five roughly doubles reply rates.
Applying to Perceptic? Get the contact, not the form.
The Perceptic interview process
3 stages · 7 days typical · take-home: yes · modelled from similar companies
We don't yet have verified candidate reports for Perceptic. What follows is the typical process for a <50-person AI company — treat it as a model, not confirmed detail.
Interview stages
Intro Call
Video call · 30 min
Culture fit and role expectations
Founder or hiring manager
Technical Deep Dive
Video call or in-person · 60 min
Past projects and problem-solving approach
Technical founder or lead
Final Round
In-person or video · 45 min
Team fit and offer discussion
Founding team
Perceptic take-home assignment
Perceptic includes a take-home exercise in their interview process. For AI roles, this typically involves a practical problem that takes 2-4 hours. Focus on clean, working code over premature optimization. They're evaluating how you think and communicate, not just the solution.
Perceptic interview timeline
At days, Perceptic's process is faster than typical for AI (10 days at this size).
Interviewed at Perceptic?
Tell us how it went — stages, questions, timeline. Takes 90 seconds and it's how this page stays accurate for the next person.
Submit your Perceptic interview experience →Perceptic jobs, frequently asked questions
How many jobs does Perceptic have open?
Perceptic currently has 7 open roles, last verified May 2026.
Does Perceptic hire remotely?
All current Perceptic roles are based in London.
What roles is Perceptic hiring for?
Perceptic is hiring across Engineering, Product, Design, Other, Data. The most recent opening is Software Engineer (Full Stack).
How do I apply for a job at Perceptic?
Apply directly through the links above, or read our guide on how to actually get hired at Perceptic.
Does Perceptic respond to cold emails?
We're still collecting cold email data for Perceptic.
Who is the hiring manager at Perceptic?
At this size, hiring is usually run by a founder or department head.
How competitive is it to get hired at Perceptic?
<50-person AI companies see ~50-100 applicants per role in two weeks. The 72-hour window is your advantage.
How many rounds is the Perceptic interview?
3 stages: Intro Call, Technical Deep Dive, Final Round.
Is the Perceptic interview hard?
It concentrates on technical depth and system design rather than abstract puzzles. The stage candidates find hardest is Technical Interview.
Does Perceptic give a take-home task?
Yes, Perceptic includes a take-home assignment.
How long does Perceptic take to get back to you?
Around 7 days across the full process.
What should I prepare for the Perceptic interview?
Prepare for technical depth and system design. A <50-person startup wants proof you can ship, not that you can whiteboard.
Where is Perceptic based?
Perceptic is headquartered in London, US.
Get Perceptic roles before they're posted
A role stays uncontested for about four days. Here's the window — and where we put you in it.
From $9/month, cancel any time.
Watching Perceptic
0 applicantsRole spotted & verified
1You get the alert
1You've applied
~8Hits the job boards
250+